Verify your idea quickly and at minimal cost with an MVP. See how we can help you.

Technology audit before an investment round: why your code might lower the company's valuation

1/18/2026
7 min
201
Business Strategy

Technical debt is financial debt. Investors treat poor code as a liability that reduces valuation. Discover how MQS prepares technology for Due Diligence.

Technology audit before an investment round: why your code might lower the company's valuation

In the process of raising capital, most founders focus obsessively on EBITDA, growth metrics, and market fit. Experience shows that this is a dangerous oversight. While financial data tells the story of the past, your technology dictates the future viability of the business. Investors conducting Technical Due Diligence are not looking for elegant syntax; they are looking for risks that threaten their capital. They verify whether your proprietary software is an asset capable of generating ROI or a liability requiring massive CapEx to fix. At MQS, we see clearly that ignoring the quality of the codebase before entering negotiations is a strategic error that allows funds to aggressively negotiate down the valuation. Your code is the engine of your business model; if it is held together by duct tape, the valuation will reflect the price of scrap, not a Formula 1 car.

The concept of "Technical Debt" is often misunderstood by non-technical boards as a purely IT problem. This is false. Technical debt acts exactly like financial debt: you have to pay interest on it. In the context of software, this interest is paid in the form of slower feature delivery, higher maintenance costs, and increased system downtime. When an auditor from a Venture Capital fund identifies significant spaghetti code, lack of documentation, or outdated libraries, they translate these findings directly into a risk premium. They calculate the cost of rewriting the system and deduct it from Your valuation. A messy codebase can slash your company's valuation by up to 30% during the final stages of negotiation. You must understand that for an investor, every dollar spent on fixing legacy code is a dollar not spent on growth. Therefore, presenting a clean, scalable architecture is not just "nice to have"—it is a defense mechanism for Your equity.

Scalability as a proxy for future revenue

The promise of high returns is based on the assumption that Your business can scale rapidly. However, a slide in a pitch deck showing a "hockey stick" growth curve means nothing if the underlying infrastructure collapses under the load of new users. During an audit, experts simulate high-load scenarios to test the resilience of Your architecture. If Your system is monolithic, tightly coupled, or relies on manual deployment processes, it fails the scalability test. An investor immediately sees a bottleneck that will cap revenue potential. They realize that before the company can grow, they will need to pause business development to re-platform the entire solution.

This scenario is a valuation killer. It signals that the capital raised will be burned on survival (refactoring), not expansion. At MQS, we analyze systems for horizontal scalability and cloud-readiness long before the investor does. We identify single points of failure that could jeopardize business continuity. By addressing these issues proactively, You demonstrate to the investor that Your technology is an enabler of growth, purely aligned with the business strategy. A scalable platform validates Your revenue projections, making them credible rather than aspirational. Without this proof, Your financial projections are treated as fiction.

Furthermore, scalability is not just about handling traffic; it is about the scalability of the development team. If Your code is so complex that onboarding a new developer takes three months, You cannot scale the team effectively. Investors look at "Time to Value"—how quickly new capital can be converted into new product features. High complexity and low readability of code destroy this metric. We advise clients to implement rigorous code standards and automated testing pipelines to prove that the team can absorb capital and convert it into product velocity immediately.

Intellectual property and security risks

Nothing ends a negotiation faster than a violation of Intellectual Property (IP) rights or a critical security vulnerability. In the rush to build an MVP, development teams often use open-source libraries without checking their licenses. The presence of a single library with a "copyleft" license (like GPL) in your core proprietary product can legally force You to open-source Your entire codebase. For a tech company, this means the instant loss of its competitive advantage and value. Due Diligence auditors use automated scanning tools to find these violations within minutes. If they find them, the deal is often dead on arrival, or the valuation collapses to zero.

Security is the second pillar of this risk assessment. A history of data breaches or the presence of hard-coded passwords in the source code signals negligence. In the era of GDPR and strict data privacy laws, a security vulnerability is a massive financial liability waiting to explode. Investors will not assume this risk without a steep discount on the share price. Ensuring your IP is clean and your security posture is robust is the most direct way to protect the integrity of the deal. MQS conducts pre-investment audits that mimic the scrutiny of a hostile auditor. We scour the codebase for license conflicts, security gaps, and dependency vulnerabilities. Cleaning this up before the data room opens is mandatory.

Do not underestimate the importance of data ownership and segregation. If Your platform serves B2B clients and commingles data in a way that makes it impossible to separate, You are creating a compliance nightmare. Investors assess the "exitability" of the business. If the data architecture prevents a clean exit or acquisition in the future, the current investment attractiveness drops. We enforce architectural patterns that ensure data sovereignty and security, treating compliance as a core feature of the software, not an afterthought.

The human factor: bus factor and documentation

Investors invest in people, but they also invest in the continuity of the business independent of specific individuals. A common red flag in early-stage tech companies is the "Bus Factor" of one—meaning if one key developer gets hit by a bus (or simply quits), the entire project halts because nobody else understands the code. This is an unacceptable operational risk. Lack of documentation, tribal knowledge locked in the head of a CTO, and obscure coding practices are indicators of an immature organization. During Due Diligence, the question is asked: "Is this a business or a hobby project of a few talented hackers?"

Professional documentation of API endpoints, architecture diagrams, and deployment procedures proves that the technology is a transferable asset. It assures the investor that the asset they are buying (the code) exists independently of the founders. MQS enforces a culture where code is self-documenting and critical processes are automated. This reduces the dependency on individual heroes and shifts the value to the organizational process. A company that can survive the departure of its lead engineer is worth significantly more than one that cannot.

Moreover, the quality of the development process itself is audited. Are You using CI/CD? Is there a QA process? Are code reviews mandatory? The absence of these practices suggests that the software is brittle and prone to regression bugs. Implementing professional SDLC (Software Development Life Cycle) processes increases investor confidence and directly supports a higher valuation multiple. It demonstrates that You run a predictable, mature software factory, not a chaotic workshop.

Conclusion: Audit as a negotiation tool

Treating a technology audit as a bureaucratic necessity is a mistake. It is a strategic negotiation tool. By conducting a pre-emptive audit with MQS, You gain control over the narrative. Instead of waiting for the investor to find faults and use them as leverage to lower the price, You present a clean bill of health or a proactive remediation plan. You verify Your own assets before anyone else does. This shifts the dynamic of the negotiation. You are no longer defending against accusations of technical debt; You are presenting a verified, scalable, and secure asset.

The cost of a pre-investment audit is negligible compared to the equity You save by defending Your valuation. Do not let bad code dilute Your ownership. Address the risks, professionalize the architecture, and enter the investment round with the confidence that Your technology is worth exactly what You say it is. At MQS, we guarantee that we will find the skeletons in the closet before the investors do, allowing You to remove them and protect Your capital.